What we build, how an engagement works, and what to expect before you share a brief.
Websites, web applications, SaaS, Android and iOS apps, desktop and macOS software, games, developer tools, APIs, backend systems and AI-enabled workflows. We also help teams secure, improve and grow existing software.
Yes. A useful starting point is one customer, one important job and one complete workflow. We can help define a first release and explicitly separate it from later features.
Yes. We begin by reviewing the codebase, deployment, known issues and ownership/access arrangements. The first deliverable may be a recovery or modernization plan rather than a rewrite.
Yes. Scope can include onboarding, app workflows, APIs, device behavior and release preparation. Device coverage, store submissions and ongoing maintenance are agreed for each engagement.
Yes. We scope the supported operating systems, installation/update path, local data and integrations before choosing the implementation approach.
Yes. We work on gameplay systems, progression, interfaces and interactive experiences. A prototype should establish the core loop before expanding content and distribution.
Send the problem, intended users, current situation and important constraints through Contact. We review fit, clarify unknowns and agree scope, responsibilities and commercial terms before work begins.
A short description of the problem, the people affected, what exists today and any deadline or budget range. A specification is helpful but not required. Avoid credentials, personal datasets and confidential attachments in the first enquiry.
It depends on scope, integrations, review cycles and readiness of content/access. Service-page timelines are planning ranges. We provide an estimate after discovery and revisit it when assumptions change.
Ownership, licensing and transfer arrangements are set out in the engagement agreement. Third-party components retain their own licences. Discuss source-code access and handover expectations before starting.
Yes. We can contribute to a defined workstream, review architecture, investigate a specific issue or support a release. Agree decision owners, review standards and access boundaries up front.
Confidentiality arrangements can be discussed before sensitive material is shared. A form submission alone does not create an NDA or a confidential engagement. Send an initial non-sensitive outline first.
Maintenance, incident response, fixes and release support can be scoped separately. Support windows, response targets, included work and escalation paths belong in the agreement rather than an assumed unlimited promise.
Yes. We establish a baseline, identify the constrained user journey and prioritize measurable changes. Modernization can be incremental: dependencies, tests, interfaces and infrastructure need not all change at once.
A scoped review of an application or system’s controls and risks. It can include architecture, configuration, authentication, authorization and operational practices. The agreed scope determines whether active testing is included.
Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing combines identifying weaknesses with agreed attempts to validate their impact. The label alone does not define coverage: assets, methods, permissions and deliverables must be written down.
Yes. Active security testing requires written authorization from an appropriate owner, a defined asset list and rules of engagement. A public website or a form enquiry is not permission to test it.
The agreed report should explain scope, limitations, prioritized findings, supporting evidence, business impact and practical remediation. Executive and engineering summaries serve different readers. Retesting can be included in the scope.
We can explain fixes, discuss tradeoffs with engineers and retest agreed findings. The engagement defines the retest window, affected assets and whether implementation work is included.
Destructive or disruptive actions are not assumed. Any high-impact testing needs explicit agreement, safeguards and a stop procedure. Where possible, assessments use test accounts and a suitable staging environment.
Yes. Scope can cover authorization, authentication, data exposure, business workflows, resource limits and integration boundaries. A useful assessment includes roles and object ownership, not only a scanner report.
Yes. Mobile scope can include application behavior, local data, authentication and associated APIs. Platform coverage, test devices and permitted techniques are agreed before testing.
Answer Engine Optimization is a term used for making information easier to discover and use in direct answers. Useful work includes clear answers, coherent structure, reliable evidence and accessible content. It does not guarantee inclusion in an answer.
Generative Engine Optimization describes work on discoverability and representation in generative search or assistant responses. The term is evolving, and systems differ. We focus on useful content, clear entities and defensible measurement.
SEO addresses discovery through search; AEO emphasizes answers; GEO emphasizes generative responses. They overlap in crawlability, understandable information and credible sources. Measurement should distinguish search impressions, visits and observed citations.
No. Search platforms and AI systems control their results. We improve technical foundations, information structure, discoverability and measurement, while documenting what changed and what the evidence can support.
Yes. We can define a small event plan, consent behavior, launch checks, landing-page structure and feedback loops. Measurement should follow a business question and avoid collecting unnecessary personal information.
Use Support and include the project/product name, expected behavior, what happened, and the browser/device where relevant. Never send passwords, OTPs or API keys. Project-specific support options will be listed when available.
The website processes the request through Vercel and sends it using Resend to PlaneByte’s business mailbox. It is used to review and respond to the request. The site does not store enquiries in an application database. See the Privacy Policy for details.
Yes. Analytics consent is separate from enquiry processing. Declining analytics does not prevent contacting PlaneByte. You can revisit your analytics choice using the footer control.
Tell us what you’re building, fixing or trying to grow.
Start a project